Logo

Google work life balance reddit. The balance depends on your team more than the company.

Google work life balance reddit Hours 35-40/week: There's so much research that shows people are most productive with 30-something hours a week. Every single work place I've been in has good work life balance and I've worked in 10 different companies so far. As an Indian, you will be perpetually stressed about maintaining your visa status, accepting the terms of your employer and take on the risk of being fired at any point. The US does not automatically guarantee a good work life balance. 3 pm will always have people doing teabreak and about 90% of the staff leaves at 6pm sharp. Right now my work life balance is super, my manager is absolutely fantastic, knows his boundaries, doesn't check my performance in terms of how many hours I'm sitting on my desk. Pay rarely correlates with work-life-balance. Generally the "famous" AWS teams like Aurora, Dynamo, EC2, IAM, etc will have terrible work life balance. Google definitely uses its name and reputation for work-life balance (WLB) to low-ball offers. Note that Amazon has a poor reputation for work life balance primarily due to being so heavily involved in the cloud. Be careful what team you join. I've had jobs with similar pay where: I've been on call 24/7/365 & worked through every vacation I ever had; and others where I've worked 5 hours a week for months on end. Currently a E5 senior engineer here but I'm craving a return to the days of being a junior dev (E3 E4 level) for improved work-life balance. Many Infosys employees do not need to work beyond 8/9 hours and are able to have a social life. Historically, Google has been one of the highest rated places to work because of a few things. Second the work-life balance is really good compared to other big tech companies (however this can depend on what team you're on). Lunches almost always exceed an hour. Let me try to provide a more nuanced opinion. I gave a lot of time and mental commitment to roles in a way that did not serve me. Ok I'm going to level with you. Any less of a commitment won't result in what you want. The first being all the perks/benefits their employees get (it's a long list and can probably be found online). For some of us, there is no work/life balance. I'd rathe have worse work-life balance and do what I am passionate about rather than do your typical jobs. My first offer from them was about 80% of what they ended up offering me, and that offer was about 80% of the top of band pay. I work at FAANG in a sales org so business revenue that my work is pretty transparent. . I've worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week and was very happy doing it because the work was challenging and fun. Rule of thumb - if you desire WLB, don't go working for a startup, or for some company that has some grand vision that is going to change the world, with some megalomaniac Jobs/Musk/Bezos type that expects you to have your 150% 25 hours a day, and will pay you below market because you're "making a difference", and getting the tech equivalent of "getting paid in exposure". Nobody is going to magically give you work life balance if your work culture doesn't already have it. You have to take it, and be willing to leave if it's unobtainable. Part of not having good work-life balance is that I love what I am doing wich can make it harder to disconnect. 30 or 5, I won't be asked any I had amazing work life balance when I worked 9-5 but I wouldn't change self-employment for 9-5. I am feeling severely burned out and not sure if I want to continue or even have the capacity to continue as a full time senior SWE. As titled, I've been working for 6 years at Meta now. At almost every company, 8. The promotions at Google are notoriously harder than other big tech, so some people do leave for a bigger paycheck and responsibilities, but the attrition is still pretty low compared to peers Just don’t let it interfere with your current gig, don’t let it slip! Worst case you’ll have an interview story, best case you’ll maybe get through! The only reason not to do it is if you are really pressed for time to interview and prepare. In a typical year, my teams work is directly tied to 40-50 million new annual recurring revenue. Once I learned to set boundaries and expectations (not only for the company, but also for myself - making myself work restricted hours), I got the work life balance I was seeking. The work life balance that you have is the one that you set. 30 you start seeing people go breakfast instead of start work. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The popular opinion on this sub seems to be that most indian companies do not offer work life balance. I'd get bored. I think they would be open to remote and work life balance could be good in some departments. Do not join GCP, Kurian is ubiquitously infamous for his micromanagement and is destroying the laid back academia charm Google has always had. There's maybe 20 people tops who are subsidized by this teams output but the reality is that 3-5 people do most of the work. Plus all work should be able to be done in that time frame (unless its an industry with crunch times, then extra work is understandable). Work is life I've been making stuff for over 60 years, first as a child learning the basics, then as a hobbyist and engineer. Work life balance is highly team dependent. It's hard to gauge a company on this without reviews from previous employees. I can stop working at 4, 4. Then I think if I switch job, it might be a better paying job but could be bad for my work life balance. A lot of this probably comes off militant — but you have to be like that about your time. WLB is poor in the cloud no matter where you work. The balance depends on your team more than the company. ain wmmz znhq tulyo evguvh hdkylpz exnw xffzuz rtip jrimk